Abstract

ABSTRACTMigration, velocity and amplitude analysis are the employed processing steps to find the desired subsurface information from seismic reflection data. The presence of free‐surface and internal multiples can mask the primary reflections for which many processing methods are built. The ability to separate primary from multiple reflections is desirable. Connecting Marchenko theory with classical one‐dimensional inversion methods allows to understand the process of multiple reflection elimination as a data‐filtering process. The filter is a fundamental wave field, defined as a pressure and particle velocity that satisfy the wave equation. The fundamental wave field does not depend on the presence or absence of free‐surface multiples in the data. The backbone of the filtering process is that the fundamental wave field is computed from the measured pressure and particle velocity without additional information. Two different multiples‐free datasets are obtained: either directly from the fundamental wave field or by applying the fundamental wave field to the data. In addition, the known schemes for Marchenko multiple elimination follow from the main equation. Numerical examples show that source and receiver ghosts, free‐surface and internal multiples can be removed simultaneously using a conjugate gradient scheme. The advantage of the main equation is that the source wavelet does not need to be known and no pre‐processing is required. The fact that the reflection coefficients can be obtained is an interesting feature that could lead to improved amplitude analysis and inversion than would be possible with other processing methods.

Highlights

  • The ability to separate primary and multiple reflections in acoustic data is desired to find the subsurface velocity distribution and to create an image of the subsurface

  • We show the result for k−(ζ, t ) as a function of ζ /2 and t in Fig. 5(b) to illustrate transmission-compensated Marchenko multiple elimination (T-Marchenko multiple elimination (MME))

  • We have shown that the fundamental wave field is related only to the subsurface impulse reflection response

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The ability to separate primary and multiple reflections in acoustic data is desired to find the subsurface velocity distribution and to create an image of the subsurface. If we deconvolve the marine data for the source time signature and its ghost and remove the receiver ghost by moving the receiver level to the free surface, the up- and down-going parts of the pressure data are given by equations (6) and (7). Where the time interval where these equations are valid is 0 < t < ζ , because the source has been moved to the receiver level These equations can be solved for the unknown up- and down-going parts of the pressure of the fundamental wave field from the impulse reflection response including free surface effects. Deconvolving the reflection response as operator ensures that the Ricker wavelet is automatically included in the fundamental wave field In this way, we solve the bandlimited version of equations (20) and (21) and (19).

90 Without previous result
SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Findings
DATA SHARING
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call