Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty questionnaire (UniQ-study): Unknown is unloved

Abstract

BackgroundAlmost 50% of the patients requiring knee replacement are suitable for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, national registries have shown a use far below 50%. AimThe aim of this study was to identify the factors that could influence the use of UKA. MethodsA questionnaire was conducted among practicing knee surgeons of the Dutch Orthopedic Association. The questionnaire was classified into three domains: surgeon, patient selection, and professional opinion. Associations between the domains and UKA volume and contra-indications were tested using Pearson’s chi-square tests. ResultsOf the 113 included respondents, 40% had no hands-on exposure during residency. Frequently reported contra-indications were obesity (68%), lateral osteophytes (21%), chondrocalcinosis (20%), and age (20%). Medial partial thickness lesions were considered a contra-indication by 49% and lateral joint space narrowing by 61% of the respondents. Respondents perceived UKA to outperform total knee arthroplasty regarding all outcomes, except survival (1.8% versus 42%). The reported barriers for UKA use were insufficient experience (20%), high revision rates (20%), and low hospital volume (16%), whereas 60% did not experience any at all. Hands-on UKA exposure during residency was associated with an increased use of correct indications. Furthermore, the use of correct indications was associated with an increased UKA volume. ConclusionWe showed a low UKA exposure during residency and considerable variations in contra-indications. These factors may contribute to an underuse of UKA. Improved UKA training could lead to increased experience and better patient selection among surgeons and consequently a higher use of medial UKA.