Abstract

Some economists have argued that the process of disintegration of world economy between the two World Wars has led to increased income divergence between the countries. This is in keeping with the view that economic integration leads to income convergence, and consequently that income divergence should follow upon economic disintegration. The paper shows that, empirically, the view that the period 1919-39 was associated with divergence of incomes among the rich countries, is wrong. On the contrary, convergence of their incomes continued and even accelerated. Since the mid-19th century, rich countries' incomes always tended to converge in peacetime regardless of whether their economies were more or less integrated. This, in turn, implies that it may not be trade, and capital and labor flows that matter for income convergence but some other, less easily observable, forces like diffusion of information and technology.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.