Uneven- vs even-aged management in Finnish boreal forests

Abstract

Summary The article summarizes results obtained from several field experiments, measured in uneven-aged forests during a long period; from the 1930s until the present. Experiments have been established in both Norway spruce- and Scots pine-dominated stands. The purpose is to evaluate the feasibility of uneven-aged forest management under Finnish conditions and compare uneven-aged management to the current even-aged forestry. The analysed datasets demonstrate relatively rich regeneration under many types of tree canopies. The number of stabilized (height 0.1–1.3 m) spruce seedlings does not always correlate with the stand density. The amount of small labile (height < 0.1 m) spruce seedlings may even increase with increasing stand volume. Contrary to spruce, the regeneration of birch and pine decreases with increasing stand volume. The yield comparisons show that uneven-aged stands have often grown faster than even-aged stands with the same post-cutting stand density. High thinnings have resulted in better volume increments than low thinnings. Recent studies show that uneven-aged management is more profitable than even-aged rotation forestry (RF), especially with high discount rates. Uneven-aged management seems to be superior to current even-aged RF also with respect to environmental and multifunctional aspects, such as carbon sequestration, bilberry yield, structural diversity and scenic values.