Abstract

The glass forming ability (GFA) of Cu–Zr alloys has been still ambiguous, due to incomplete or lacking thermophysical properties of Cu–Zr liquids in supercooled and stable states, although tremendous effort has been devoted. We provide here the comprehensive thermophysical properties of Cu–Zr liquids, such as undercoolability, density, viscosity, fusion enthalpy, temperature–time-transformation (TTT) diagram, and crystal–liquid interfacial free energy. Three compositions, Cu64Zr36, Cu56Zr44, and Cu50Zr50, show distinctive anomalies in undercoolability, nose time in TTT, and crystal–liquid interfacial free energy, but not in density and viscosity in supercooled and stable liquid states. The anomalies reflect that the GFA is dominantly governed by thermodynamics rather than kinetics in these bulk metallic glasses (BMGs). In addition, we find that positions of nose temperatures in the TTT curves are below 1/2 (Tg + Tl), which implies unequal contribution of thermodynamics and kinetics. We discuss that empirical GFA parameters cannot explain the glass formation of Cu–Zr alloys due to the unequal contribution, and the Turnbull GFA criterion (Trg = Tg/Tl) is valid for the equal contribution of the two effects. The present experimental findings shed light on the ongoing debate about the GFA criterion of Cu–Zr BMGs.

Highlights

  • A deeply supercooled liquid freezes without crystallization when it approaches its glass transition temperature, which is governed by two entangled mechanisms, thermodynamics and kinetics

  • The stability of the supercooled liquids invokes that the glass forming ability (GFA) of the Cu–Zr alloys results from the thermodynamic effect.[23]

  • We find the maxima in undercoolability, nose time in TTT curves, and crystal–liquid interfacial free energy for the three best Cu–Zr bulk metallic glasses (BMGs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A deeply supercooled liquid freezes without crystallization when it approaches its glass transition temperature, which is governed by two entangled mechanisms, thermodynamics and kinetics. The empirical parameters have been successfully employed to predict the glass forming ability (GFA) of many BMGs, the parameters have often failed to explain glass formation in multicomponent alloys[6,7,8,9,10] and even in simple binary Cu–Zr alloys.[5,11] the compositional dependence of the GFA in Cu–Zr alloys is very mysterious, and requires a more rigorous foundation for determining the GFA This failure has stimulated the development of precise GFA parameters.[12,13,14,15]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call