Abstract
This study investigates whether firm status in networks is a burden in the context of negative rumors. We use a network approach to capture firms' network of affiliations through cross-shareholding and to identify status hierarchies embedded in the relational structure. Using a sample of 1428 negative rumors related to 913 firms during the period 2007–2015, we find that the market responds negatively to negative rumors and that high-status firms suffer more than low-status firms do. Our mechanism tests show that high-status firms attract more attention from the media than low-status firms and that differential media attention plays a mediating role in the relationship between firm status and market response to rumors. In addition, we find that investor sentiment strengthens the status-market response relation. Further analyses show that although high-status firms vigorously deny rumors by rumor clarification announcements, their denial strategy does not function as intended. These results provide robust evidence that status is a burden when encountering negative rumors and that media play an essential role in facilitating the relationship between firm status and market reaction to negative rumors.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
