Abstract
Cohesive soils subjected to cyclic loading in undrained conditions respond with pore pressure generation and plastic strain accumulation. The article focus on the pore pressure development of soils tested in isotropic and anisotropic consolidation conditions. Due to the consolidation differences, soil response to cyclic loading is also different. Analysis of the cyclic triaxial test results in terms of pore pressure development produces some indication of the relevant mechanisms at the particulate level. Test results show that the greater susceptibility to accumulate the plastic strain of cohesive soil during cyclic loading is connected with the pore pressure generation pattern. The value of excess pore pressure required to soil sample failure differs as a consequence of different consolidation pressure and anisotropic stress state. Effective stresses and pore pressures are the main factors that govern the soil behavior in undrained conditions. Therefore, the pore pressure generated in the first few cycles plays a key role in the accumulation of plastic strains and constitutes the major amount of excess pore water pressure. Soil samples consolidated in the anisotropic and isotropic stress state behave differently responding differently to cyclic loading. This difference may impact on test results analysis and hence may change the view on soil behavior. The results of tests on isotropically and anisotropically consolidated soil samples are discussed in this paper in order to point out the main features of the cohesive soil behavior.
Highlights
The cyclic loading sources can be distinguished into two categories
The primary objective of this study is to present the differences between isotropic and anisotropic consolidation in response to cyclic loading
Test results were discussed separately in order to explain the phenomena that occurred during cyclic loading
Summary
The cyclic loading sources can be distinguished into two categories. The first one is natural sources as ocean waves or earthquake. The bearing capacity failure will not be reached but excessive settlements can occur [2,5,6]. When thick embankments are designed, the repeating loading can be transmitted to the subgrade soils, which will result in unknown settlements. The solution to this problem is to increase the embankments thickness and to prevent the cyclic loads to be imposed on the subgrade soils. This solution generates extra costs to road construction due to longer embankment construction and settlements of subgrade
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
