Abstract

The basic prerequisite for using any language is the willingness of the speaker to follow the rules of the game. Socially defined norms of language use then tend to set the limits within which one can express oneself using this language. Whether these norms set the speaker free or whether they act as constraints in a free expression of Self, is a question that will be raised in this article. Using examples from Hindi, the paper highlights the role of such norms of language use in perpetuating gender stereotypes. Gender stereotypes get constructed as part of a broader process of social differentiation but the site of this construction is to a large extent the normal everyday discourse. A normal classroom discussion amongst university students in New Delhi thus shows how deep rooted such stereotypes are and how effectively they get perpetuated through language and linguistic norms in Indian society. The basic premise in this paper is that meanings are context-specific, they are not fixed and they get created in discourse. But since language use is one thread in social fabric, it serves as an instrument to construct and perpetuate gender stereotypes. The paper is more of an essay on issues that became obvious about gender stereotypes during two classroom discussions. It should not therefore be taken as a study into the deeper aspects of gender representation in Hindi.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThrough this process of using a particular language for giving voice to her subjectivity, she becomes party to the agreement to abide by the norms laid down by that language community

  • As member of a particular language community the speaker is more often than not negotiating the space prescribed to her believing that she is using the language as a neutral means of expressing the Self

  • The language user as social actor conforms to as well as deviates from the social norms of speaking. Destroys and redefines her territories and her identity. Gender is one such social identity, "a complexity whose totality is permanently deferred, never fully what it is at any given juncture in time."

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Through this process of using a particular language for giving voice to her subjectivity, she becomes party to the agreement to abide by the norms laid down by that language community. This tacit alignment with the socially sanctioned norms of linguistic behaviour serves to strengthen the role of discourse as a site for construction of gender stereotypes. The other alternative is the masculine noun insaan, which means 'human being', but in non-generic usage this noun is not used to denote female human beings

Normative social expectations in language use
Reflection of stereotypical gender notions in matrimonial advertisements
Goddess or Doormat
For a discussion on depiction of the death wish for a girl child see
Two ways of overcoming social normative restrictions of Hindi
The problem of giving a name to the man-woman relationship
Some examples showing stereotyped notions on gender
Purpose behind showing the film
Context of the film
Presentation of a few examples
F4: She was also sharif
Stereotypes are here to stay
F2: Everybody wants companionship
Interpreting motives
Women as language users
F6: Not openly
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call