Underwater versus conventional cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps 4-9mm in diameter: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has been reported as safe and effective method for the removal of small colorectal polyps. However, some studies showed low R0 resection rate. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is an effective technique to increase the proportions of complete resection. Therefore, the aim was to compare the rate of R0 resection of colorectal polyps 4-9mm in diameter between conventional CSP (C-CSP) and underwater CSP (U-CSP). This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 198 polyps (4-9mm) in 110 patients were enrolled between December 2019 and June 2020. The polyps were randomized to be treated with either C-CSP (100 polyps) or U-CSP (98 polyps). The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in U-CSP group than in C-CSP groups (84.7% vs. 59.0%; p < 0.001). The polyp retrieval rate of C-CSP and U-CSP was 94.5% and 100% (p = 0.030). The rate of polyp fragmentation of C-CSP and U-CSP group was 5.3% and 0% (p = 0.027). The resection time and retrieval time were longer in C-CSP than U-CSP (45.0 ± 37.7s vs. 34.1 ± 21.2s, p = 0.032 and 51.9 ± 67.7s vs. 12.7 ± 12.4s, p < 0.001). No clinically significant bleeding or perforation occurred in either group. The results of this study were excellent with U-CSP of 4-9mm colorectal polyps in terms of R0 resection, polyp retrieval and fragmentation rate, and procedure/retrieval time. Therefore, U-CSP is a safe and effective technique for removing colorectal polyps 4-9mm in diameter. KCT (0004530).