Understorey plant species show long‐range spatial patterns in forest patches according to distance‐to‐edge

Abstract

AbstractQuestionsHow does the presence of understorey plant species vary with distance‐to‐edge along very large periphery‐to‐interior and forest patch size gradients? Can forest core and periphery species profiles be identified? What life‐history traits can discriminate between forest core and forest periphery species?LocationTemperate forests in the northern half of France.MethodsLocal climate, soil, stand characteristics and landscape metrics were collected on 19 989 plots in 1801 forest patches using data from the French National Forest Inventory. Very large distance‐to‐edge (3–1096 m) and patch size gradients (327–100 000 ha) were explored. Four logistic regression models were compared to determine the response patterns of 214 species to distance‐to‐edge, while controlling for patch size and local habitat quality (soil, climate and stand). The maximum distance of correlation between species occurrence and distance‐to‐edge was assessed using response curve characteristics. The relationships between life‐history traits (habitat preference, preference for ancient forests, reproduction mode, dispersal mode, life form and autecology) and species profile according to distance‐to‐edge were tested.ResultsOf the 214 species analysed, 40 had a core profile and 38 a periphery profile. The maximum distance of correlation was on average 748 m. Core species were more often species reproducing both by seed and vegetatively, ancient forest species, anemochores, bryophytes, pteridophytes, hemicryptophytes and acidophiles, whereas peripheral species were more often species reproducing by seed only, endozoochores, phanerophytes, thermophiles, basophiles, nitrogen‐demanding and heliophiles.ConclusionsSignificant periphery‐to‐core patterns of distribution were detected over much larger ranges than hitherto recognized for common understorey plant species. Plant traits differentiated forest core from forest periphery species. This deep gradient cannot be solely explained by the usual edge‐related biotic and abiotic factors. We hypothesized that it was due to edge displacement following general reforestation since ca. 1830. This edge shift created recent forests with new habitats on former agricultural lands where dispersal‐limited core species had slowly expanded and forest edge species regressed at variable speeds. This long periphery‐to‐interior gradient of presence has important implications for forest plant species distribution, dynamics and conservation.