Abstract

Patients with orthopedic problems often use assistive devices, e.g., ankle-foot orthoses and therapeutic footwear, to support their mobility. However, many users are not satisfied with their devices or do not use them at all, resulting in a decrease of quality of life. It has been shown that a main cause for dissatisfaction and non-use lies in the process of drawing up requirements. It appears that orthopedic engineers have too little insight in the different areas of life of patients leading to deficient design requirements. In this article a general approach—the so-called Triple I model—is presented to understand the different areas of life of patients. This model offers, in line with and directed by the intention of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model three perspectives or ‘pairs of lenses’ to analyze these areas of life: the identity, the interests of key stakeholders or social actors, and the underlying societal ideals. The Triple I model is elaborated for assistive devices and offers an associated methodology to orthopedic engineers to systematically map the different areas of life of patients, to understand the requirements for every area, and to explore the conditions. In case of assistive devices five different areas of life have to be investigated: daily living at home, work, transport, social and spiritual activities, sport and leisure.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe idea of ‘quality of life’ in health care can be traced back to the definition of health by the

  • The idea of ‘quality of life’ in health care can be traced back to the definition of health by theWorld Health Organization (WHO) in 1948 [1]

  • In the previous section we have argued that it is a primary responsibility for orthopedic engineers to understand the different areas of life of their patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The idea of ‘quality of life’ in health care can be traced back to the definition of health by the. World Health Organization (WHO) in 1948 [1]. With ‘Quality of Life’ the standard of health, comfort, and happiness experienced by an individual or group is defined; in other words, it is about “the things that are needed for a good life”. The introduction of quality of life alongside health, has to be regarded as the first development to consider health from a more integral and more human perspective. This approach was hardly discussed in the world of medicine before the sixties. A single publication was devoted to it [3]

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call