Abstract
It is wise before the idea of building a model, read and make sure it is really necessary to do first. See you in the event that the literature provides us with competing models and theories. It is then necessary to proceed by reading, in other words to test each of these models to retain more or less specifically or to see everyone's contribution to the knowledge of the phenomenon. The approach taken tries to answer the obvious question that arises every researcher on the evaluation of the models and the choice between them. A question that lies at the heart of the unresolved debate between rationalism and relativism. These two currents oppose. When models are competing penchant for one is not the fruit of justification by experience statements constituting the theory or finding of a logical reduction of the theory to experiment. Popper (1973) proposes to adopt the model that defends the better, that is to say the one that seems to be more representative of reality. And we follow this approach in the sense that building our own model based on an evaluation of the existing. We call our ASP model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.