Abstract
Introduction: Due to a longstanding controversy over the perfusion reliability of zone IV current this area is routinely discarded despite the mechanism behind zone IV necrosis not being fully understood. The authors review and investigate the vascular anatomy of zone IV with the aim of outlining the reasons for necrosis.Methods: A literature search and review of archival injection studies performed by the authors was undertaken to identify the arterial and venous maps of the abdomen. Unembalmed abdominal wall and full body specimens were used for cadaveric studies to demonstrate the arterial anastomotic patterns and venous drainage pathways of the deep inferior epigastric, superficial inferior epigastric, superficial circumflex iliac and intercostal systems.Results: Cadaveric injection studies demonstrated the presence of true and choke anastomoses between all lower abdominal arterial branch systems. Venous studies found that the dominant venous drainage is through large caliber superficial epigastric and circumflex iliac veins, a system which is interrupted in flap elevation and redirected to the perforator venae comitantes, with inter-territory communicating oscillating veins also becoming a limiting factor between territories. Conclusion: The mechanism behind the common failure of zone IV in the DIEP flap is explained with studies demonstrating both potential arterial and venous limiting factors. The authors conclude that the mechanism is indeed multifactorial, however suggest that when zone IV in DIEP tissue transfer is required, fat below Scarpa’s fascia is excised and the contralateral SIEV is preserved for use as an additional venous anastomosis.
Highlights
The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become a mainstay of microsurgical breast reconstruction due to its low donor site morbidity and comparable success rates
Taylor, Gascoigne, Corlett, Ashton: Understanding the vascular anatomy of zone IV in deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator flaps epigastric and circumflex iliac veins, a system which is interrupted in flap elevation and redirected to the perforator venae comitantes, with inter-territory communicating oscillating veins becoming a limiting factor between territories
The mechanism behind the common failure of zone IV in the DIEP flap is explained with studies demonstrating both potential arterial and venous limiting factors
Summary
The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become a mainstay of microsurgical breast reconstruction due to its low donor site morbidity and comparable success rates. The perfusion zones of the DIEP originate from the studies of Scheflan and Dinner[5,6] on the transverse rectus abdominis flap that became known as the Hartrampf zones after his work was published on the TRAM flap.[7] Hartrampf zones divide the lower abdominal ellipse of skin into four equal parts based on arterial inflow and set the boundaries for the level of perfusion of each portion of flap tissue that may be used for breast reconstruction. These TRAM flap zones were originally based around all cutaneous perforators of the DIEA to supply the skin, with the four parts numbered according to perfusion level, based on the assumption of a centrally perfused skin ellipse with peripherally decreasing supply
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.