Abstract
Keith Storey outlined a comprehensive overview examining the pros and cons of Special Olympics and the unintended negative consequences for participants. In conclusion, he briefly summarized three options on how to respond to Special Olympics: (a) make no change, (b) reform the current structure but keep the basic conditions of Special Olympics, or (c) discontinue or replace Special Olympics with programs designed to promote more inclusive recreational leisure situations. The purpose of this article is to employ Habermas’s theory of communicative action relative to the issues and concerns outlined by Storey into this framework to increase the understanding of the Special Olympics as a movement and a system. Newly gained insights from this investigation reveal a conceptual/philosophical disconnect between (a) the Special Olympics as a meritocratic deficit-based system according to the 1960s Liberal Egalitarian lifeworld view of people with disabilities and (b) the current lifeworld view of empowerment for persons with disabilities as promoted by researchers, scholars, and educators needed to achieve socially valuable lifestyles (social justice). The Special Olympics’ antiquated deficit lifeworld view has largely resulted in outdated program practices that run counter to the current empowered lifeworld view of integrated recreational living.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
