Understanding the seismic response of electrical equipment subjected to high–frequency ground motions

Abstract

Ground motion studies in Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) show that the ground motion response spectra exceeds design spectrum of nuclear power plants in high–frequency range. To ensure safe shutdown of nuclear power plants in events where design spectrum is exceeded, the safety–related digital control systems and electrical equipment such as relays must be seismically qualified for high–frequency ground motions. Conventionally, uncoupled linear analysis of building and electrical cabinet is conducted and then seismic demands on equipment are evaluated. The conventional analysis ignores effects of various factors such as geometric nonlinearities, mass interaction between primary (building) and secondary (electrical cabinet) systems, etc. Ignoring such factors leads to unnecessarily high seismic demands on equipment. In this study, the seismic demands on equipment are evaluated by conducting both coupled and uncoupled analysis of linear primary system and linear as well as nonlinear secondary system. Various cases are analyzed where at least one mode of primary system is tuned with one mode of secondary systems. Each case is subjected to both low–frequency and high–frequency ground motions to compare the difference in response to each ground motion. The seismic demands on equipment are compared for coupled and uncoupled analysis as well as for linear and nonlinear systems. The results show reduction in seismic demands on electrical equipment for various nonlinear coupled analysis cases. The high seismic demands evaluated from linear uncoupled analysis may lead to exclusion of some electrical equipment which can be avoided by conducting coupled nonlinear analysis of primary–secondary systems and obtaining the realistic seismic demands on equipment.