Abstract

BackgroundCommunicating official public health information about infectious diseases is complicated by the fact that individuals receive much of their information from their social contacts, either via interpersonal interaction or social media, which can be prone to bias and misconception.ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the effect of public health campaigns and the effect of socially communicated health information on learning about diseases simultaneously. Although extant literature addresses the effect of one source of information (official or social) or the other, it has not addressed the simultaneous interaction of official information (OI) and social information (SI) in an experimental setting.MethodsWe used a series of experiments that exposed participants to both OI and structured SI about the symptoms and spread of hepatitis C over a series of 10 rounds of computer-based interactions. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a high, low, or control intensity of OI and to receive accurate or inaccurate SI about the disease.ResultsA total of 195 participants consented to participate in the study. Of these respondents, 186 had complete responses across all ten experimental rounds, which corresponds to a 4.6% (9/195) nonresponse rate. The OI high intensity treatment increases learning over the control condition for all symptom and contagion questions when individuals have lower levels of baseline knowledge (all P values ≤.04). The accurate SI condition increased learning across experimental rounds over the inaccurate condition (all P values ≤.01). We find limited evidence of an interaction between official and SI about infectious diseases.ConclusionsThis project demonstrates that exposure to official public health information increases individuals’ knowledge of the spread and symptoms of a disease. Socially shared information also facilitates the learning of accurate and inaccurate information, though to a lesser extent than exposure to OI. Although the effect of OI persists, preliminary results suggest that it can be degraded by persistent contradictory SI over time.

Highlights

  • During a contagious disease outbreak, public health campaigns provide people with relevant information, including symptoms and methods of transmission

  • In an era in which official public health campaigns are frequently in competition with information shared on social media, this study provides some reason to be optimistic that public health campaigns may be able to overcome socially shared misperceptions

  • Our work focuses on the context of a contagious disease, the results may contribute to our understanding of how social media may affect other aspects of health or may relate to other domains

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During a contagious disease outbreak, public health campaigns provide people with relevant information, including symptoms and methods of transmission. The public’s understanding is critical for people to know which behaviors they should avoid and whether they should seek medical attention To this end, public health campaigns are led by federal, state, local, and other organizations, which we refer to as official sources of information. Communicating official public health information about infectious diseases is complicated by the fact that individuals receive much of their information from their social contacts, either via interpersonal interaction or social media, which can be prone to bias and misconception. Conclusions: This project demonstrates that exposure to official public health information increases individuals’ knowledge of the spread and symptoms of a disease. The effect of OI persists, preliminary results suggest that it can be degraded by persistent contradictory SI over time

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call