Understanding the Reactivity of Mn-Oxo Porphyrins for Substrate Hydroxylation: Theoretical Predictions and Experimental Evidence Reconciled.

Abstract

The Mn-oxo porphyrin (MnOP) mechanism for substrate hydroxylation is computationally studied with the aim to better understand reactivity in these systems. Theoretical studies suggest Mn(V)OP species to be very reactive intermediates with thermally accessible reaction barriers represented by low-spin/high-spin-crossover occurring in the Mn(V)OP oxidant, and kinetics for selected Mn(V)OP species indeed find high reactivity. On the other hand, MnOP complexes lead to modest yields in hydroxylation reactions of several different substrates, implying low rate constants and high reaction barriers. The resolution of this inconsistency is very important to understand the reactivity of Mn-oxo porphyrins and to improve the catalytic conditions. In this work we use the toluene hydroxylation by the Mn(V)OP(H2O)+ complex as a case study to gain deep insight into the reaction mechanism. Minimum energy crossing point (MECP) results on the H-abstraction process from toluene indicate a first crossover from a singlet to a triplet spin state of the Mn(V)OP(H2O)+ species with a thermally accessible barrier, followed by a very facile H-abstraction by the triplet complex. Issues concerning (i) the validation of the level of the density functional theory employed (BP86) to describe the singlet-triplet energy gap in the Mn(V)OP(H2O)+ system versus highly accurate DMRG-CASPT2/CC calculations, and (ii) the influence of the axial ligand (X = none, Cl-, CH3CN, OH-, and O2-) on MnOP reactivity, which models the different experimental conditions, are addressed. The ligand trans influence mainly controls the reactivity through the singlet-triplet energy gap modulation, with the porphyrin ruffling distortion also finely tuning it. Finally, a stepwise model for the H-abstraction process is proposed which allows a direct comparison between the calculated and experimentally measured Gibbs free activation energy barriers ( Zhang et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005 , 127 , 6573 - 6582 ). The low yields in catalysis are shown not to be due to low reactivity of Mn(V).