Abstract

Objective: This study explored the psychosocial experiences of adults with hearing loss using the self-regulatory model as a theoretical framework. The primary components of the model, namely cognitive representations, emotional representations, and coping responses, were examined. Design: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. The data were analysed using an established thematic analysis procedure. Study sample: Twenty-five adults with mild-moderate hearing loss from the UK and nine hearing healthcare professionals from the UK, USA, and Canada were recruited via maximum variation sampling. Results: Cognitive representations: Most participants described their hearing loss as having negative connotations and consequences, although they were not particularly concerned about the progression or controllability/curability of the condition. Opinions differed regarding the benefits of understanding the causes of one’s hearing loss in detail. Emotional representations: negative emotions dominated, although some experienced positive emotions or muted emotions. Coping responses: engaged coping (e.g. hearing aids, communication tactics) and disengaged coping (e.g. withdrawal from situations, withdrawal within situations): both had perceived advantages and disadvantages. Conclusions: This novel application of the self-regulatory model demonstrates that it can be used to capture the key psychosocial experiences (i.e. perceptions, emotions, and coping responses) of adults with mild-moderate hearing loss within a single, unifying framework.

Highlights

  • MethodsSampling and recruitment Two groups of participants were recruited: (1) adults with mildmoderate hearing loss, as defined as having a mean hearing threshold between 20–70 dB HL in the better ear averaged across 0.25–4 kHz or a unilateral hearing loss (British Society of Audiology, 2011), and (2) hearing healthcare professionals

  • This study used the self-regulatory model (SRM) to explore the psychosocial experiences of adults with mild-moderate hearing loss

  • While the psychosocial impact of hearing loss has been examined in previous studies, the application of health psychology theory to this subject is still in its infancy

Read more

Summary

Methods

Sampling and recruitment Two groups of participants were recruited: (1) adults with mildmoderate hearing loss, as defined as having a mean hearing threshold between 20–70 dB HL in the better ear averaged across 0.25–4 kHz or a unilateral hearing loss (British Society of Audiology, 2011), and (2) hearing healthcare professionals. The purpose of obtaining the views of different stakeholders, known as triangulation, was to enhance the rigour of the study (Yardley, 2008). Adults with hearing loss were recruited through the Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit (BRU) participant database via email or post. Hearing healthcare professionals were recruited from the authors’ professional network via email. Maximum variation sampling was carried out, such that sampling continued until participants with diverse characteristics and experiences were recruited (Patton, 1990).

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.