Abstract
The paper explores the debate on religious language by considering several key perspectives: the logical positivists’ criterion of meaningfulness, Karl Popper's falsifiability principle, the parable of the invisible gardener, and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s concept of language games. By examining these views, we aim to understand whether religious language can be considered meaningful or whether it fails to meet the standards set by these philosophical frameworks.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
