Understanding the impacts of public transit disruptions on bikeshare schemes and cycling behaviours using spatiotemporal and graph-based analysis: A case study of four London Tube strikes

Yuanxuan Yang,Roger Beecham,Alison Heppenstall,Andy Turner,Alexis Comber

doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103255

Yuanxuan Yang, Roger Beecham + Show 3 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103255

Copy DOI

Abstract

Understanding the interactions between different travel modes is crucial for improving urban transport resilience, especially during times of disruption and transit failure. As a flexible and sustainable travel mode, bikeshare schemes are able to solve “first/last” mile problems in urban transit as well as provide an alternative to motorised traffic. This paper uses OD (origin and destination) trip data from the London Cycle Hire Scheme and temporal docking station bike availability data to explore the impact of four separate London Underground (Tube) strikes on bikeshare usage and behaviours. The results suggest that bikeshare usage generally rises in response to Tube disruptions, but the extent and nature of this rise in use varies according to the type of disruption. A novel measure of station pressure suggests that the scheme very quickly reaches saturated capacity and is unusable in certain parts of London during disruptions. A graph-based analysis reveals several changes in OD flow structures. This implies a modal shift from Tube to bikeshare and a change of route behaviours among bikeshare users. Weekday Tube strikes bring new behaviours and new OD pairs to the bike flow structures, whilst for weekend strikes existing patterns are consolidated. The corollary is that more heterogenous OD trip patterns are introduced by higher volumes of commuting trips and intense competition of cycles/docks. Cyclists are forced into using alternative (second or third preference) docking stations with new behaviours, and possibly users, as journeys that would otherwise be made via the Tube are made via bikeshare. This work comprehensively presents and compares the impacts of Tube strikes under varied circumstances and offers a detailed understanding of the changed cycling behaviours that could be used in transport planning and management.

Highlights

Public transit disruptions have become more frequent in recent years due to the increasing maintenance needs of ageing infrastructure, nat ural disasters as well as social and political events such as city-wide festivals and strikes (Zhu et al, 2017; Gonçalves and Ribeiro, 2020; Rahimi et al, 2020)
This is consistent with other obser vational studies (Saberi et al, 2018), but we add that this distance decay effect is much stronger where the tube strike events occur in parts of the city that typically serve commuting journeys
This study demonstrates that there is a distinct geog raphy to affected travel behaviours and ridership that is consistent with previous studies (Saberi et al, 2018), with the pattern conditional on whether the disrupted parts of the city and the time periods relate to commuting activities

Summary

Introduction

Public transit disruptions have become more frequent in recent years due to the increasing maintenance needs of ageing infrastructure, nat ural disasters as well as social and political events such as city-wide festivals and strikes (Zhu et al, 2017; Gonçalves and Ribeiro, 2020; Rahimi et al, 2020) Such events and disruptions can significantly affect the resilience of transportation systems. Among different travel modes in big cities, bikeshare schemes are low-cost, highly flexible and convenient (Shaheen et al, 2013) In urban contexts, they fill an important gap between pedestrian and vehicular transport (Curran, 2008), and can provide a genuine alternative travel mode when other parts of the transportation system experience disruptions. Studies evaluating the impact of transit disruption on bikeshare usage are critical for mitigating the impacts for disadvantaged groups

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion