Abstract
In this article we study the Helms-Burton Act in the intersections of foreign policy, American law, and international law. We provide an explanation of the making of the law through the lenses of policymaking, and the core variables that drove the process, as we consider that it was an act of foreign policy, and that foreign policy is a particular form of public policy. We discuss the legality of the statute within American law, and point out its inconsistencies and open contradictions with the constitutional framework of the United States, as it violates some of its core principles and provisions. We examine the legality of the Helms-Burton according to international law, and determine that it violates several fundamental principles included in the Charter of the United Nations and other major international treaties and charters of international organisations, of which the United States is a signatory.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.