Abstract
Through a survey, conducted in early 2019, we try to assess the consequences of impact factors on the scholarly practices of the community of historians of economics and economic thought. This first systematic glance on the possible impact of these metrics on the scholarly community shows that they are considered as a limited source of information about the quality and originality of articles but they show the centrality and visibility of a journal. Respondents report limited effects on their own careers and scholarly practices and a greater impact on those of their colleagues. The possible consequences, according to respondents, seem to be negative especially for the visibility of the field and because they promote strategic behaviors that are not necessarily related to quality among their colleagues as authors, referees, and editors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
