Abstract

AbstractThe response of forests and terrestrial ecosystems to disturbance is an important process in the global carbon cycle in the context of a changing climate. This study focuses on the effect of selective felling (thinning) at a managed forest site. Previous statistical analyses of eddy covariance data at the study site had found that disturbance from thinning resulted in no significant change to net ecosystem carbon uptake. In order to better understand the effect of thinning on carbon fluxes, we use the mathematical technique of four‐dimensional variational data assimilation. Data assimilation provides a compelling alternative to more common statistical analyses of flux data as it allows for the combination of many different sources of data, with the physical constraints of a dynamical model, to find an improved estimate of the state of a system. We develop new observation operators to assimilate daytime and nighttime net ecosystem exchange observations with a daily time step model, increasing observations available by a factor of 4.25. Our results support previous analyses, with a predicted net ecosystem carbon uptake for the year 2015 of 426 ± 116 g C m−2 for the unthinned forest and 420 ± 78 g C m−2 for the thinned forest despite a model‐predicted reduction in gross primary productivity of 337 g C m−2. We show that this is likely due to reduced ecosystem respiration postdisturbance compensating for a reduction in gross primary productivity. This supports the theory of an upper limit of forest net carbon uptake due to the magnitude of ecosystem respiration scaling with gross primary productivity.

Highlights

  • The response of forests and terrestrial ecosystems to disturbance is one of the least understood components in the global carbon cycle [Ciais et al, 2014]

  • Heinemeyer et al [2012] discuss the possibility of this tight coupling between gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration leading to an upper limit for forest CO2 uptake due to increased GPP leading to increased respiration, which is discussed by Heath et al [2005]. Our results support this hypothesis, as ecosystem respiration scales with GPP after approximately 46% of trees are removed from the study site, meaning that we find no significant change in net ecosystem carbon uptake after thinning

  • In this work we have investigated the response of a managed forest ecosystem to the disturbance of selective felling by using data assimilation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The response of forests and terrestrial ecosystems to disturbance (e.g., felling, fire, or insect outbreaks) is one of the least understood components in the global carbon cycle [Ciais et al, 2014]. Other studies, analyzing flux tower eddy covariance records, find no significant change in the observed net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2 after thinning [Vesala et al, 2005; Moreaux et al, 2011; Dore et al, 2012; Saunders et al, 2012; Wilkinson et al, 2015]. These studies suggest that this is due to increased light availability and reduced competition allowing ground vegetation to display increased GPP and compensate for an increase in heterotrophic respiration postdisturbance

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call