Understanding the disparate PTSD prevalence for U.S. and Mexico via social comparison effect types that inform perception of trauma difficulty.

Abstract

The United States (U.S.) and Mexico have vastly different lifetime prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), despite similarly high rates of trauma exposure. To explain this disparate prevalence, we created the Perception of Trauma Difficulty Assessment Tool (PTDAT) to identify four social comparison effect types that inform perception of trauma difficulty (i.e., Upward Assimilation Effect, Downward Assimilation Effect, Downward Contrast Effect, Upward Contrast Effect) to determine whether there was a dominant effect type associated with respondents' perception of coping with trauma difficulty for a sample of U.S. Americans and Mexicans. We identified sociodemographic characteristics and the degree of trauma exposure that associated with PTSD, PTSD symptom severity, and functional impairment for each effect type. This was a cross-sectional study of a sample of 898 U.S. Americans and 902 Mexicans. A chi-square test determined whether there was a dominant effect type for each national group. For each effect type, multiple regression analyses identified predictors of PTSD, PTSD symptom severity, and functional impairment. For U.S. Americans, trauma exposure was a predictor for PTSD for effect type Upward Contrast Effect, when respondents contrasted from an excellent appraisal of most people by making a poor self-appraisal. For Mexicans, all effect types had predictors for PTSD, with trauma exposure being a predictor for all. These preliminary findings provide support to consider patients' social context as it informs their perception of their capacity to cope, which may maintain PTSD. Future research is needed to determine whether perceptions of trauma difficulty are stable over time. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).