Abstract

The supersymmetric contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment $a_\mu$ and to the decay $\mu\to e\gamma$ are given by very similar Feynman diagrams. Previous works reported correlations in specific scenarios, in particular if $a_\mu$ is dominated by a single diagram. In this work we give an extensive survey of the possible correlations. We discuss examples of single-diagram domination with particularly strong correlations, and provide corresponding benchmark parameter points. We show how the correlations are weakened by significant cancellations between diagrams in large parts of the MSSM parameter space. Nevertheless, the order of magnitude of $\text{BR}(\mu \to e \gamma)$ for a fixed flavor-violating parameter can often be predicted. We summarize the behavior by plotting the correlations as well as resulting bounds on the flavor-violating parameters under various assumptions on the MSSM spectrum.

Highlights

  • Of only the flavor-violating SUSY breaking parameters and derive stringent bounds on these parameters, which cannot be evaded by raising the overall SUSY mass scale

  • We show how the correlations are weakened by significant cancellations between diagrams in large parts of the MSSM parameter space

  • We summarize the behavior by plotting the correlations as well as resulting bounds on the flavor-violating parameters under various assumptions on the MSSM spectrum

Read more

Summary

Status of relevant observables

The difference between the experimental determination [4] and the SM prediction for the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon is larger than 3σ. Further progress can be expected from improvements on the theory side, but in particular from Fermilab P989 [10, 11] and the new J-PARC approach to the g − 2/EDM measurements [12]. Both aim to improve the experimental uncertainty of aμ by at least a factor of 4. The current 90% C.L. upper limit on the branching ratio BR(μ → eγ), set by the MEG experiment [13], is BR(μ → eγ) < 5.7 × 10−13 ≡ BREXP(μ → eγ),.

Superparticle masses
Chargino-sneutrino contributions
Neutralino-charged slepton contributions
Similar SUSY masses
Chargino dominance
Large μ limit
Neutralino–μR dominance
Discussion and main results
Specific results for the case of chargino dominance
Specific results for cases with neutralino dominance
Findings
Comparison of different scenarios

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.