Abstract

BackgroundLongstanding variation in the views of family physicians (FPs) on the role of opioids seems to translate into widely varying prescribing rates. Improvement interventions are unlikely to achieve change if they do not understand and explicitly target the factors that determine physician prescribing behaviour. The aim of this work was to understand (1) the perspectives of FPs as it relates to opioid prescribing, and (2) the perceived barriers and enablers to guideline-adherent opioid prescribing and management of chronic non-cancer pain.MethodsA qualitative study involving one-on-one, semi-structured interviews with a sample of FPs in Ontario, Canada. Interviews were analyzed using a directed content analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. A framework approach was used to explore interaction across behavioural determinants (factors influencing behaviour) as well as demographic sources of variation. The behaviour of interest for the current study was the prescribing of opioid medications (including initiation, renewal, and dose reduction) for patients with chronic, non-cancer pain. Associated issues in the overall management of such patients were also explored.ResultsInterviews were conducted with 22 FPs. Behavioural determinants interacted with one another to influence FPs prescribing behavior. The TDF domain Beliefs about Consequences played a central role in explaining physician prescribing behaviours as they related to the management of chronic non-cancer pain. Individual beliefs about prescribing consequences and patient behaviour interacted with prescriber beliefs about capabilities and perceptions of the FP’s professional role to influence prescriber behaviour. Emotion and the environmental context influenced the impact of these determinants on opioid prescribing and the management of chronic non-cancer pain.ConclusionsFPs face a wide range of complex (and often interacting) challenges when prescribing opioid therapy to their patients. Solution-based strategies should target these determinants directly using evidence-based strategies that move beyond guideline dissemination and general education. Shared decision-making strategies and patient-facing decision aids are likely to decrease the tension experienced in challenging conversations.

Highlights

  • Longstanding variation in the views of family physicians (FPs) on the role of opioids seems to translate into widely varying prescribing rates

  • Participants A total of 22 FPs participated in a one-time interview

  • When analyzing the data according to demographic characteristics, more experienced physicians generally reported higher levels of confidence in prescribing opioids, which was attributed to strong therapeutic relationships

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Longstanding variation in the views of family physicians (FPs) on the role of opioids seems to translate into widely varying prescribing rates. In Canada, the number of opioid prescriptions, and the proportion of ‘strong’ opioids (i.e., oxycodone, hydromorphone, morphine, and Desveaux et al BMC Family Practice (2019) 20:59 from the medical community to emergent evidence on opioid risks. Despite this shift, family physicians (FPs) in Ontario demonstrate widely varying prescribing rates. Longstanding variation in the views of FPs on the role of opioids may be a contributing factor, presenting a possible target for behaviour change interventions. Almost 10 years later, variations in opioid-related knowledge and self-reported practice patterns persisted [9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call