Abstract

It is important to develop understanding of what underpins the engagement of students in online learning environments. This article reports on a multiple case study that explored student engagement in a set of postgraduate degrees offered on a fully online basis. The study was based on a theorization of student engagement as the exercise of intentional human action, .or agency. It identified ways in which tasks and social relations in the online learning environments triggered reflexivity on the part of students, with ‘reflexivity’ understood to mean the ordinary mental capacity to consider oneself in relation to one’s social setting. A different relationship between reflexivity and student engagement was in view than that identified by Margaret Archer with regard to reflexivity and social mobility. Rather than displaying one dominant mode of reflexivity, the students considered in the study were seen to draw on a range of modes. The engagement of these students in their learning was also seen to depend on the manner in which they engaged in reflexivity centred on the pursuit of shared goals, that is in collective reflexivity. Specific practices were seen to trigger constructive forms of collective reflexivity, while fractured and restricted forms of collective reflexivity were linked to student disengagement in relation to joint tasks. As well as adverting to the importance of collective reflexivity to learning, the study highlights scope for dissonance between the modes of reflexivity and practices favoured by an online learning environment and the reflexive profile of the student.

Highlights

  • A significant amount of research demonstrates that educational technology can usefully support the engagement of online learners

  • The study by Chen et al (2010), based on data linked to the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) in the United States, argued that there is a positive relationship between the use of learning technology, student engagement and outcomes of learning

  • We have seen in this study how a set of online learning environments triggered reflexivity as students sought to establish concrete courses of action and sustained practices, in the face of uncertainty and complexity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A significant amount of research demonstrates that educational technology can usefully support the engagement of online learners. Trow (2006) argued that in social systems where higher education is seen as effectively obligatory, there will be challenges in maintaining the motivation of students As a whole, this picture supports the contention of Coates (2007) that we have a good understanding of ways in which specific forms of Understanding student engagement in online learning. If one is looking to prioritise concerns, undertake projects or embed practices, it is important to deliberate on the ways in which one’s concerns and activities relate to one’s social context She explored the different ways in which individuals engage in this deliberation, identifying a set of distinctive modes of reflexivity. It is important to attend to such variation in case study research (Stake 2006), with Archer (2007) emphasising the way in which different contexts have the potential to affect the exercise of reflexivity

Method
Conclusions
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call