Understanding sources of uncertainty and bias error in models of human response to low amplitude sonic booms

Abstract

A pool of 240 subjects was exposed to a library of waveforms consisting of example signatures of low boom aircraft. The signature library included intentional variations in both loudness and spectral content, and were auralized using the Gulfstream SASS-II sonic boom simulator. Post-processing was used to quantify the impacts of test design decisions on the “quality” of the resultant database. Specific lessons learned from this study include insight regarding potential for bias error due to variations in loudness or peak over-pressure, sources of uncertainty and their relative importance on objective measurements and robustness of individual metrics to wide variations in spectral content. Results provide clear guidance for design of future large scale community surveys, where one must optimize the complex tradeoffs between the size of the surveyed population, spatial footprint of those participants, and the fidelity/density of objective measurements.