Abstract

Data-driven machine learning (ML) provides a promising approach to understanding and predicting the rejection of trace organic contaminants (TrOCs) by polyamide (PA). However, various confounding variables, coupled with data scarcity, restrict the direct application of data-driven ML. In this study, we developed a data-knowledge codriven ML model via domain-knowledge embedding and explored its application in comprehending TrOC rejection by PA membranes. Domain-knowledge embedding enhanced both the predictive performance and the interpretability of the ML model. The contribution of key mechanisms, including size exclusion, charge effect, hydrophobic interaction, etc., that dominate the rejections of the three TrOC categories (neutral hydrophilic, neutral hydrophobic, and charged TrOCs) was quantified. Log D and molecular charge emerge as key factors contributing to the discernible variations in the rejection among the three TrOC categories. Furthermore, we quantitatively compared the TrOC rejection mechanisms between nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) PA membranes. The charge effect and hydrophobic interactions possessed higher weights for NF to reject TrOCs, while the size exclusion in RO played a more important role. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of the data-knowledge codriven ML method in understanding TrOC rejection by PA membranes, providing a methodology to formulate a strategy for targeted TrOC removal.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.