Abstract

The assessment of collective risk for flood risk management requires a better understanding of the space-time characteristics of flood magnitude and occurrence. In particular, classic formulation of collective risk implies hypotheses concerning the independence of intensity and number of events over fixed time windows that are unlikely to be tenable in real-world hydroclimatic processes exhibiting persistence. In this study, we investigate the links between the serial correlation properties of 473 daily stream flow time series across the major river basins in Europe, and the characteristics of over-threshold events which are used as proxies for the estimation of collective risk. The aim is to understand if some key features of the daily stream flow data can be used to infer properties of extreme events making a more efficient and effective use of the available data. Using benchmark theoretical processes such as Hurst-Kolmogorov (HK), generalized HK (gHK), autoregressive fractionally integrated moving average (ARFIMA) models, and Fourier surrogate data preserving second order linear moments, our findings confirm and expand some results previously reported in the literature, namely: (1) the interplay between short range dependence (SRD) and long range dependence (LRD) can explain the majority of the serial dependence structure of deseasonalized data, but losing information on nonlinear dynamics; (2) the standardized return intervals between over-threshold values exhibit a sub-exponential Weibull-like distribution, implying a higher frequency of return intervals longer than expected under independence, and expected return intervals depending on the previous return intervals; this results in a tendency to observe short (long) inter-arrival times after short (long) inter-arrival times; (3) as the average intensity and the number of events over one-year time windows are not independent, years with larger events are also the more active in terms of number of events; and (4) persistence influences the distribution of the collective risk producing a spike of probability at zero, which describes the probability of years with no events, and a heavier upper tail, suggesting a probability of more extreme annual losses higher than expected under independence. These results provide new insights into the clustering of stream flow extremes, paving the way for more reliable simulation procedures of flood event sets to be used in flood risk management strategies.

Highlights

  • Extreme river floods are one of the major natural hazards that have affected European countries for centuries [1,2,3], causing many deaths and billions US$ damages in the last decades [4,5].Historical records worldwide show that floods tend to cluster in time (e.g., [3,6])

  • Since the three methods yield similar results, and iterative amplitude adjusted Fourier transformation (IAAFT) signals differ from the observed sequences in the statistics of order higher than two, we argue that the difference should be mainly due to the temporal skewness or higher order properties, and to nonlinear dynamics that are not captured by linear models and can be related to multifractality/varying scaling behavior (e.g., [19,71,72])

  • We have investigated the properties of daily stream flow fluctuations exceeding high thresholds analyzing 473 time series recorded in the major basins in Europe, and comparing the results with those corresponding to synthetic time series simulated by a set of linear models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Historical records worldwide show that floods tend to cluster in time (e.g., [3,6]) This phenomenon concerning the temporal fluctuation of floods can be related to the dynamics of processes exhibiting. Water 2016, 8, 152 long range dependence (LRD) or temporal persistence This type of dynamics has widely been studied since its recognition by Hurst [7], resulting in a range of diagnostics (e.g., [8,9,10,11,12]) and modeling tools [13,14,15,16,17]. Dealing with stream flow processes, the interaction between short range dependence (SRD) and LRD can affect the recognition of the actual dynamics and the estimation of parameters summarizing. Detection and identification of SRD and LRD are affected by the sample size

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.