Abstract

Following study of the external morphology and its unmatched variability throughout ontogeny and a re-examination of selected morphological characters based on many specimens of diplomystids from Central and South Chile, we revised and emended previous specific diagnoses and consider Diplomystes chilensis, D. nahuelbutaensis, D. camposensis, and Olivaichthys viedmensis (Baker River) to be valid species. Another group, previously identified as Diplomystes sp., D. spec., D. aff. chilensis, and D. cf. chilensis inhabiting rivers between Rapel and Itata Basins is given a new specific name (Diplomystes incognitus) and is diagnosed. An identification key to the Chilean species, including the new species, is presented. All specific diagnoses are based on external morphological characters, such as aspects of the skin, neuromast lines, and main lateral line, and position of the anus and urogenital pore, as well as certain osteological characters to facilitate the identification of these species that previously was based on many internal characters. Diplomystids below 150 mm standard length (SL) share a similar external morphology and body proportions that make identification difficult; however, specimens over 150 mm SL can be diagnosed by the position of the urogenital pore and anus, and a combination of external and internal morphological characters. According to current knowledge, diplomystid species have an allopatric distribution with each species apparently endemic to particular basins in continental Chile and one species (O. viedmensis) known only from one river in the Chilean Patagonia, but distributed extensively in southern Argentina.

Highlights

  • The catfish family Diplomystidae Eigenmann, 1890, endemic to continental waters of the Andean Region (Austral Realm) of South America, represents one of the earliestHow to cite this article Arratia and Quezada-Romegialli (2017), Understanding morphological variability in a taxonomic context in Chilean diplomystids (Teleostei: Siluriformes), including the description of a new species

  • Diplomystidae is the sister to all other catfishes (e.g., Lundberg & Baskin (1969) based on the caudal skeleton; Fink & Fink (1981), Fink & Fink (1996), Arratia (1987), Grande (1987) and Pinna (1998) based on miscellaneous morphological characters; Arratia (1992) based especially on characters of the suspensorium), whereas according to molecular evidence, Nematogenyidae Eigenmann, 1927 plus all other loricarioids are the sister of Diplomystidae plus all other catfishes (Sullivan, Lundberg & Hardman, 2006)

  • According to the phylogenetic analysis of Arratia (1987; Fig. 1A ), Diplomystidae includes two genera, Diplomystes Duméril, 1856 (with three valid species, D. chilensis (Molina, 1782), D. nahuelbutaensis Arratia, 1987 and D. camposensis Arratia, 1987), and Olivaichthys Arratia, 1987, which are found in freshwaters of Chile and Argentina, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The catfish family Diplomystidae Eigenmann, 1890, endemic to continental waters of the Andean Region (Austral Realm) of South America, represents one of the earliestHow to cite this article Arratia and Quezada-Romegialli (2017), Understanding morphological variability in a taxonomic context in Chilean diplomystids (Teleostei: Siluriformes), including the description of a new species. The most recent molecular study, which included Argentinean diplomystids, listed only D. viedmensis as a valid species for the country (Muñoz-Ramírez et al, 2014; Fig. 1B ), confirming the morphological phylogenetic hypothesis of Arratia Considering that in both morphological and molecular hypotheses Diplomystes and Olivaichthys are monophyletic, we interpret Olivaichthys as a valid taxon, an approach that we follow here

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call