Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the study is to describe the implications of strategic lead times (SLTs) for return on investment (ROI).Design/methodology/approachThis study was part of an interactive research project and is based on the logic of theory application leading to theory building. It uses a multiple case study with five holistic single cases. Empirical data (ED) have mainly been collected from interviews and focus groups.FindingsThe length of and uncertainty in SLTs have implications for companies' financial performance. These implications vary in strength and can be either direct or indirect. These findings are incorporated into a framework on SLTs' implications for ROI.Research limitations/implicationsThe presented array of SLTs' implications for ROI could be further investigated, focussing on their strength. Additionally, it would be interesting to substantiate the findings in the context of environmental and social sustainability (i.e. the triple bottom line).Practical implicationsThe findings offer practitioners a rich description and understanding of SLTs' actual implications for financial performance in terms of ROI. This knowledge can support practitioners in analysing supply chain designs based on financial performance.Originality/valueUsing a combination of a relative financial performance measure (ROI) and a set of SLTs (systems perspective), this study focuses on SLTs' actual implications for ROI. The findings provide evidence that different sections of a supply chain can have different implications for revenue, cost and investment (i.e. the three absolute measures related to ROI).

Highlights

  • Lead time is relatively simple to measure

  • A check mark (U) indicates that the respondents from the different case companies consider an strategic lead times (SLTs) to have implications for an absolute measure related to return on investment (ROI)

  • Comparing the empirical data with the conceptual model The findings presented in sections 4 and 5 provide a comprehensive overview of how SLTs have implications for ROI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lead time is relatively simple to measure. But a standardised way of estimating the cost of reducing lead time is missing. – Strategic purchaser, TurbineCo. . . it is challenging to clearly see the actual payoff from reducing lead times. Lead time is relatively simple to measure. A standardised way of estimating the cost of reducing lead time is missing. – Strategic purchaser, TurbineCo. it is challenging to clearly see the actual payoff from reducing lead times. It is challenging to clearly see the actual payoff from reducing lead times This means that we [PumpCo], in some situations, do not prioritise short lead times in projects involving procurement. – Inbound/outbound manager, PumpCo. Lead time is an important aspect when it comes to competing for customer orders. Lead time is an important aspect when it comes to competing for customer orders It is, difficult to assess the value of lead time. Difficult to assess the value of lead time In product costing, it is usually the cost of the product that is

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call