Understanding individual experiences with stick-built and modular cleanrooms: Lessons learned and a call to action.

Abstract

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. The purpose of this study was to assess the real-world experiences of cleanroom managers and specialists who have designed, installed, and maintained stick-built and/or modular cleanrooms, delineate the advantages and disadvantages of each type of cleanroom, and gather sterile compounding cleanroom design and installation advice and lessons learned. This study was conducted via surveys and semistructured interviews of individuals with cleanroom experience in the previous 5 years. Qualitative analyses were conducted on participants' survey and interview responses to assess their satisfaction with each type of cleanroom and to determine what they perceive to be the pros and cons of each type based on their own experiences. Key lessons learned and advice from these individuals were also extracted from their survey and interview responses. Fourteen individuals from 13 US states completed the survey; twelve participated in follow-up interviews. Fifty percent of the participants (n = 7) had installed 5 or more cleanrooms in the previous five years and over half (n = 8; 57%) had 7 or more years of cleanroom experience. The average satisfaction scores for each type of cleanroom, on a 1 to 10 scale, was 5.3 for stick-built (n = 11) and 9.3 for modular (n = 4). The pros of stick-built cleanrooms included greater design and material flexibility and lower up-front costs. The pros of modular cleanrooms included the cleanroom experience and expertise of modular vendors, quick and easy installations, guaranteed certification, and high-quality and durable design features and materials. Additionally, modular cleanrooms had fewer long-term maintenance issues, greater long-term flexibility, and lower indirect and long-term costs than stick-built cleanrooms. Key pieces of advice from the participants included the following: do your homework before beginning a cleanroom project; make sure heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system(s) and air handlers are adequate for your needs; and remember that the ultimate purpose of a quality cleanroom is patient safety. Participants also advocated for industry-wide cleanroom standards that go beyond USP regulations. The findings of this study confirm many of the purported pros and cons of each type of cleanroom, with further insight gained into the relative quality and costs of each type. Modular cleanrooms were considered by most participants to be a better long-term option, based on quality and lifetime costs, if feasible to install. Study participants also emphasized that designing and installing pharmacy cleanrooms is a complex and time-intensive process that often comes with a steep learning curve. While there are federal and state cleanroom standards available and consultants for hire, a comprehensive resource or manual that could provide guidance, insight, and collective lessons learned on cleanroom design and installation is needed.