Abstract

In educational research, the amount of learning opportunities that students receive may be conceptualized as either an attribute of the context or climate in which that student attends school, or as an individual difference difference in perception of opportunity among students, driven by individual factors. This investigation aimed to inform theory-building around student learning opportunities by systematically comparing eleven theoretically plausible latent and doubly latent measurement models that differed as to the locus (i.e., student- or school-level) and dimensional structure of these learning opportunities. A large (N = 963) and diverse sample of high-school students, attending nine fifteen different high-schools, was analyzed. Results suggested that student learning opportunities are best conceptualized as distinct but positively correlated factors, and that these doubly latent factors occurred at the student level, although with a statistical correction for school-based clustering. In this way, student learning opportunities may be best described as individual perceptions, rather than an indicator of school climate or context. In general, these results are expected to inform current conceptualizations of student learning opportunities within schools, and function as an example of the substantive inferences that can be garnered from multi-level measurement modeling.

Highlights

  • Classical reliability statistics for each of the other scales fell in the range of 0.80–0.90

  • This investigation has been a systematic comparison of a number of theoretically plausible latent and doubly latent models for conceptualizing high school students’ learning opportunities

  • Associated with these models have been research questions associated with both the underlying dimensionality of this construct, as well as the locus of the construct at the individual or aggregate level. The results of this investigation are able to offer a number of principal findings that may deeply inform the conceptualization of student learning opportunities—and high school student perceptions of these opportunities—in the future

Read more

Summary

Participants

Participants were 963 11th and 12th grade students attending fifteen public high schools in Southern California. The main useful aspect of this preliminary pilot study was in the dropping, adding, or rewording of items in order to maximize the content validity (based on student feedback) of the measure After these edits to items were completed, this measure contained a total of 62 polytomously scored Likert-type items organized into 9 scales, each designed to tap self-reported student perceived opportunities for a different dimension of learning. Items like My teacher gives us points on a test or homework for how we solved a problem, not just whether we got the right answer, were used to tap student opportunities for meaningful assessment Items such as I work on a project that combines more than one subject (for example, science and literature), were utilized on the interdisciplinary learning scale, while the real-world connections scale included items like We connect what we are learning to life outside the classroom

Procedures
RESULTS
IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call