Abstract

Abstract. Recent research has shown that secondary organic aerosols (SOA) are major contributors to ultrafine particle growth to climatically relevant sizes, increasing global cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations within the continental boundary layer (BL). However, there are three recent developments regarding the condensation of SOA that lead to uncertainties in the contribution of SOA to particle growth and CCN concentrations: (1) while many global models contain only biogenic sources of SOA (with annual production rates generally 10–30 Tg yr−1), recent studies have shown that an additional source of SOA around 100 Tg yr−1 correlated with anthropogenic carbon monoxide (CO) emissions may be required to match measurements. (2) Many models treat SOA solely as semi-volatile, which leads to condensation of SOA proportional to the aerosol mass distribution; however, recent closure studies with field measurements show nucleation mode growth can be captured only if it is assumed that a significant fraction of SOA condenses proportional to the Fuchs-corrected aerosol surface area. This suggests a very low volatility of the condensing vapors. (3) Other recent studies of particle growth show that SOA condensation deviates from Fuchs-corrected surface-area condensation at sizes smaller than 10 nm and that size-dependent growth rate parameterizations (GRP) are needed to match measurements. We explore the significance of these three findings using GEOS-Chem-TOMAS global aerosol microphysics model and observations of aerosol size distributions around the globe. The change in the concentration of particles of size Dp > 40 nm (N40) within the BL assuming surface-area condensation compared to mass-distribution net condensation yielded a global increase of 11% but exceeded 100% in biogenically active regions. The percent change in N40 within the BL with the inclusion of the additional 100 Tg SOA yr−1 compared to the base simulation solely with biogenic SOA emissions (19 Tg yr−1) both using surface area condensation yielded a global increase of 13.7%, but exceeded 50% in regions with large CO emissions. The inclusion of two different GRPs in the additional-SOA case both yielded a global increase in N40 of < 1%, however exceeded 5% in some locations in the most extreme case. All of the model simulations were compared to measured data obtained from diverse locations around the globe and the results confirmed a decrease in the model-measurement bias and improved slope for comparing modeled to measured CCN number concentration when non-volatile SOA was assumed and the extra SOA was included.

Highlights

  • Atmospheric aerosols affect both health and climate

  • The percent change in N40 within the boundary layer (BL) with the inclusion of the additional 100 Tg secondary organic aerosols (SOA) yr−1 compared to the base simulation solely with biogenic SOA emissions (19 Tg yr−1) both using surface area condensation yielded a global increase of 13.7 %, but exceeded 50 % in regions with large carbon monoxide (CO) emissions

  • All of the model simulations were compared to measured data obtained from diverse locations around the globe and the results confirmed a decrease in the model-measurement bias and improved slope for comparing modeled to measured cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atmospheric aerosols affect both health and climate. These health and climate effects depend directly on aerosol size and composition. The formation of ∼ 1 nm diameter particles from the clustering of vapors, is likely the dominant source of aerosol number to the atmosphere (Kulmala et al, 2004). These particles must grow to CCN sizes, primarily through condensation, in order to affect climate (Pierce and Adams, 2007; Vehkamäki and Riipinen, 2012). Whether or not these particles survive to CCN sizes depends on the competition between condensational growth and coagulational scavenging with the pre-existing aerosol (Kerminen and Kulmala, 2002; Pierce and Adams, 2007; Kuang et al, 2009; Westervelt et al, 2013). Faster particle growth rates allow more particles to survive to CCN sizes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.