Understanding farmers diversity in non-timber forest products activities in Ogun State, Nigeria

Abstract

There is an increasing need for smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan region to explore multiple income streams, which would help them to overcome the challenges of food insecurity and poverty. Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) provide a cheap alternative for these resource constrained farmers. However, much is not known about the characterizing differences among the resource-constrained smallholding farmers engaged in NTFP activities. Understanding these differences will provide valuable insights on the challenges and potentials of NTFPs. To this end, this study developed a farmer typology among the different farmers engaging in NTFP activities in Ogun State, Nigeria, exploring their social and economic dynamics and outcomes within the sector and characterizing the farmers by different household components, access to forest lands, and income levels. Primary data of 350 households were collected by randomly sampling respondents associated with NTFPs in 15 wards in Sagamu Local Government Area of Ogun State. Four distinct farmer types were identified; Type 1 - consisting of male-headed households; Type 2, comprising both male and female-headed households; Type 3, female-headed households; and Type 4, with young male household heads. Type 1 farmers have high productivity and income from NTFP cultivation, albeit with higher production costs, but Type 2 outperforms other types by employing a comprehensive approach that combines trading and collection of NTFPs. Type 3 farmers face limitations in income generation due to limited access to forest areas, whereas Type 4 farmers exhibit average income levels and limited access to forestlands. Additionally, trading and collection of NTFP in the region could be a very viable economic option for the farmers, but there are challenges, such as assessing forest areas and forest reserves and gender inequality, that need to be overcome. A future study that can explore the profitability of NTFP activities considering the heterogeneity among farmers was suggested, as such studies could be helpful to better understand the challenges facing NTFP farmers in the regions. Finally, we recommend the promotion of gender equality, enhancement of market linkages as well as skills and knowledge in the bid to enable farmers to maximize income generation and make informed decisions. By implementing these recommendations, policymakers and practitioners can foster sustainable and inclusive NTFP-based livelihoods, benefiting rural communities and contributing to poverty reduction and environmental conservation.