Abstract

Extinction debt refers to delayed species extinctions expected as a consequence of ecosystem perturbation. Quantifying such extinctions and investigating long‐term consequences of perturbations has proven challenging, because perturbations are not isolated and occur across various spatial and temporal scales, from local habitat losses to global warming. Additionally, the relative importance of eco‐evolutionary processes varies across scales, because levels of ecological organization, i.e. individuals, (meta)populations and (meta)communities, respond hierarchically to perturbations. To summarize our current knowledge of the scales and mechanisms influencing extinction debts, we reviewed recent empirical, theoretical and methodological studies addressing either the spatio–temporal scales of extinction debts or the eco‐evolutionary mechanisms delaying extinctions. Extinction debts were detected across a range of ecosystems and taxonomic groups, with estimates ranging from 9 to 90% of current species richness. The duration over which debts have been sustained varies from 5 to 570 yr, and projections of the total period required to settle a debt can extend to 1000 yr. Reported causes of delayed extinctions are 1) life‐history traits that prolong individual survival, and 2) population and metapopulation dynamics that maintain populations under deteriorated conditions. Other potential factors that may extend survival time such as microevolutionary dynamics, or delayed extinctions of interaction partners, have rarely been analyzed. Therefore, we propose a roadmap for future research with three key avenues: 1) the microevolutionary dynamics of extinction processes, 2) the disjunctive loss of interacting species and 3) the impact of multiple regimes of perturbation on the payment of debts. For their ability to integrate processes occurring at different levels of ecological organization, we highlight mechanistic simulation models as tools to address these knowledge gaps and to deepen our understanding of extinction dynamics.

Highlights

  • Species extinctions after any ecosystem perturbation or disturbance are not all immediate (Box 1)

  • The variety of processes, the ecological level at which they act, and interactions among them complicate the ability to predict which, when and why species go extinct. Understanding this extinction dynamics and the underlying processes is paramount, considering that current extinction debts represent a sizable portion of the predicted 1 million species threatened with extinction (hundreds of thousands of terrestrial species alone – Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) 2019, based on Hoskins et al 2019)

  • We build up on the work of Kuussaari et al (2009), the most recent review summarizing the challenges in understanding extinction debts; of Hylander and Ehrlén (2013), who emphasize the importance of processes happening at the individual, population and metapopulation levels in generating extinction debts; of Jackson and Sax (2010), who highlight the importance of transient dynamics of biodiversity response to environmental change such as the co-occurrence of extinction debts and immigration credits; and of Essl et al (2015a), who highlight the contributions of hierarchical processes at different ecological levels and at different rates

Read more

Summary

Review and synthesis

Understanding extinction debts: spatio–temporal scales, mechanisms and a roadmap for future research. Extinction debt refers to delayed species extinctions expected as a consequence of ecosystem perturbation. We propose a roadmap for future research with three key avenues: 1) the microevolutionary dynamics of extinction processes, 2) the disjunctive loss of interacting species and 3) the impact of multiple regimes of perturbation on the payment of debts. For their ability to integrate processes occurring at different levels of ecological organization, we highlight mechanistic simulation models as tools to address these knowledge gaps and to deepen our understanding of extinction dynamics.

Introduction
IniƟal equilibrium e
Overview of literature
Empirical work
Theoretical work
Methodological work
Mechanisms generating and delaying extinctions debts
Mechanistic simulation modeling as a navigational tool
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call