Abstract

This commentary addresses a series of articles in Prevention Science about environmental causes of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It provides an overview of their key findings and places them in a broader context to facilitate their interpretation. Each of thearticles included in the special issueis a meta-analysis assessing the association of ADHD with several environmental exposures. Each of the author teamssystematically searched for articles and defined eligibility criteria. They assured that the measurement of risk factors preceded the measurement of ADHD. Most of the analyses are based on many studies with many participants in the constituent studies. As is typical of any observational epidemiologic study, the constituent studies could not correct for all possible confounds because some were not measured, and some are unknown. For this reason, these meta-analyses may have documented confounded associations, which calls for cautious interpretations.None of the constituent studies assessed what might be the most important type of confounding, familial, and genetic confounding, which occurs when the environmental exposure being studied is correlated with the genetic risk of the disorder being studied or other familial risk factors. Addressing familial/genetic confounding requires a genetically informed study. Because of these issues, the results presented here are intriguing but require further examination before one can conclude that the reported associations correspond to causal events for ADHD. A pathway forward is suggested by drawing parallels between genomic and exposure research.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call