Abstract

As Dante explains in his epistle to Can Grande, the purpose of the Comedy is to move the reader from a state of misery to a state of happiness. The poet himself testifies that the poem was written as a work of moral philosophy oriented to the achievement of happiness, eudaimonia: the beatific vision of God. Moreover, Dante insists on his poem’s efficacy to affect in its readers a similar moral and religious transformation as that which the poem represents through the narrative journey of the pilgrim. To put it another way, Dante represents his poem’s relationship to its reader as a kind of virtuous friendship. This essay sets forth a model for teaching Dante’s poem as an experiment in virtuous friendship that can transform the classroom into a workshop for the philosophical and religious quest for happiness. This involves teaching the text with an eye not only to the content and style of the poem but also to the performative and participatory demands of the text. Beginning with this framework, this essay works out pedagogical strategies for teaching the Comedy as a form of virtuous friendship extended over the centuries between Dante Alighieri and the contemporary reader. Chiefly, I explore ways Dante makes his readers complicit in the pilgrim’s own moral and spiritual journey toward the virtue of hope translated into the practice of prayer through a close, pedagogical reading of Inferno 3, Purgatorio 5, and Paradiso 20. I explore ways that Dante’s use of surprise, shock, misdirection, appeal to mystery, and retreat to silence creates a morally significant aporia of knowledge that serves as a laboratory for readers’ own virtuous transformation. I end with a critical assessment of the challenges involved in understanding the Comedy as virtuous friendship.

Highlights

  • As Dante explains in his epistle to Can Grande, the purpose of the Comedy is to move the reader from a state of misery to a state of happiness

  • Is “understanding” equivalent to historical or literary re-construction of the text? Does understanding consist in the ability to rehearse the difference between a Guelph and the Ghibelline, to state what “Virgil” and “Beatrice’ symbolize, and to memorize the logical ordering of Dante’s afterlife?

  • The goal is to think with the Comedy as a project of self-knowledge and intellectual, moral, and spiritual growth and formation

Read more

Summary

Teaching toward Understanding

I begin with what I hope is not a controversial claim. The goal of teaching Dante’s. (3) I assign weekly reflection journals in which students pick a specific scene from the week’s reading that they find especially important, controversial, disagreeable, or significant They must in 500 words or less, personally interact with the selected text, arguing with it, challenging it, praising it. (5) students must write a reflection paper in which they narrate their own “social imaginary” or “picture of the good life” in conversation with the texts of our course. The goal of this assignment is for students to “look along” our course texts to consider their own lives, loves, and ambitions. The goal is to think with the Comedy as a project of self-knowledge and intellectual, moral, and spiritual growth and formation

Reading toward Virtue7
The Challenges of Reading for Virtuous Friendship
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call