Abstract

Background and AimsCrown shyness describes the phenomenon whereby tree crowns avoid growing into each other, producing a puzzle-like pattern of complementary tree crowns in the canopy. Previous studies found that tree slenderness plays a role in the development of crown shyness. Attempts to quantify crown shyness have largely been confined to 2-D approaches. This study aimed to expand the current set of metrics for crown shyness by quantifying the characteristic of 3-D surface complementarity between trees displaying crown shyness, using LiDAR-derived tree point clouds. Subsequently, the relationship between crown surface complementarity and slenderness of trees was assessed.MethodsFourteen trees were scanned using a laser scanning device. Individual tree points clouds were extracted semi-automatically and manually corrected where needed. A metric that quantifies the surface complementarity (Sc) of a pair of protein molecules is applied to point clouds of pairs of adjacent trees. Then 3-D tree crown surfaces were generated from point clouds by computing their α shapes.Key ResultsTree pairs that were visually determined to have overlapping crowns scored significantly lower Sc values than pairs that did not overlap (n = 14, P < 0.01). Furthermore, average slenderness of pairs of trees correlated positively with their Sc score (R2 = 0.484, P < 0.01), showing agreement with previous studies on crown shyness.ConclusionsThe characteristic of crown surface complementarity present in trees displaying crown shyness was succesfully quantified using a 3-D surface complementarity metric adopted from molecular biology. Crown surface complementarity showed a positive relationship to tree slenderness, similar to other metrics used for measuring crown shyness. The 3-D metric developed in this study revealed how trees adapt the shape of their crowns to those of adjacent trees and how this is linked to the slenderness of the trees.

Highlights

  • IntroductionForest structure can be defined as the spatial arrangement of above-ground biomass in a forest (Von Gadow and Hui, 2002)

  • Context and backgroundForest structure can be defined as the spatial arrangement of above-ground biomass in a forest (Von Gadow and Hui, 2002)

  • Crown surface complementarity showed a positive relationship to tree slenderness, similar to other metrics used for measuring crown shyness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forest structure can be defined as the spatial arrangement of above-ground biomass in a forest (Von Gadow and Hui, 2002). Forest structure plays a key role in many ecological processes and determines to a large degree the functioning of a forest ecosystem. Previous studies have shown that forest structure influences primary productivity as it determines the way in which forests capture sunlight (Ishii et al, 2004; Hardiman et al, 2011, 2013; Williams et al, 2017). Forest structure affects animal and plant communities by the way in which it shapes habitats in the forest (Franklin and Whitelam, 2005; Burrascano et al, 2008; Halpern and Spies, 2008). Forest structure may regulate a forest’s resilience against disturbances such as windthrow (Ryan, 2002) and fire (Everham and Brokaw, 1996)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call