Abstract

Social circles, groups, lists, etc. are functionalities that allow users of online social network (OSN) platforms to manually organize their social media contacts. However, this facility provided by OSNs has not received appreciation from users due to the tedious nature of the task of organizing the ones that are only contacted periodically. In view of the numerous benefits of this functionality, it may be advantageous to investigate measures that lead to enhancements in its efficacy by allowing for automatic creation of customized groups of users (social circles, groups, lists, etc). The field of study for this purpose, i.e. creating coarse-grained descriptions from data, consists of two families of techniques, community discovery and clustering. These approaches are infeasible for the purpose of automation of social circle creation as they fail on social networks. A reason for this failure could be lack of knowledge of the global structure of the social network or the sparsity that exists in data from social networking websites. As individuals do in real life, OSN clients dependably attempt to broaden their groups of contacts in order to fulfill different social demands. This means that ‘homophily’ would exist among OSN users and prove useful in the task of social circle detection. Based on this intuition, the current inquiry is focused on understanding ‘homophily’ and its role in the process of social circle formation. Extensive experiments are performed on egocentric networks (ego is user, alters are friends) extracted from prominent OSNs like Facebook, Twitter, and Google+. The results of these experiments are used to propose a unified framework: feature extraction for social circles discovery (FESC). FESC detects social circles by jointly modeling ego-net topology and attributes of alters. The performance of FESC is compared with standard benchmark frameworks using metrics like edit distance, modularity, and running time to highlight its efficacy.

Highlights

  • Social networks have become a common vocabulary for representing complex systems across various domains

  • Online social networks (OSNs) are popular service platforms, such as Facebook, Google+, and Twitter, among others, which are commonly represented as graphs for purpose of efficient analysis [1]

  • It is argued that just as individuals do in real life, OSN clients attempt to broaden their groups of friends in order to fulfill different social demands [4]. It enhances user experience, the notion of social circles is not well received by users. This is due to the requirement of physically creating social circles and periodically reassigning member connections to appropriate social circles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social networks (graphs) have become a common vocabulary for representing complex systems across various domains. Facebook’s social network has been increasing in popularity and had recorded close to 200 million active client accounts by late 2018, with around 10 million messages being posted each hour and 46% of youthful clients logging in to their Facebook accounts as the first thing in their day. Behind this ubiquity lies a rich wellspring of data that could be legitimately coordinated and broken down for better

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call