Abstract

One of the most striking aspects of animal groups is their remarkable variation in size, both within and between species. While a number of mechanistic models have been proposed to explain this variation, there are few comprehensive datasets against which these models have been tested. In particular, we only vaguely understand how environmental factors and behavioral activities affect group-size distributions. Here we use observations of House sparrows (Passer domesticus) to investigate the factors determining group-size distribution. Over a wide range of conditions, we observed that animal group sizes followed a single parameter distribution known as the logarithmic distribution. This single parameter is the mean group size experienced by a randomly chosen individual (including the individual itself). For sparrows, the experienced mean group size, and hence the distribution, was affected by four factors: morning temperature, place, behavior and the degree of food spillage. Our results further indicate that the sparrows regulate the mean group size they experience, either by groups splitting more or merging less when local densities are high. We suggest that the mean experienced group size provides a simple but general tool for assessing the ecology and evolution of grouping.

Highlights

  • Groups of animals are seen engaged in behaviors as diverse as social foraging [1,2], predator detection [3,4], and navigation [5,6]

  • The first mechanistic models emphasized the use of the negative binomial distribution for animal group-size distributions [11,12,13]

  • The best fit of all the models was provided by the logarithmic distribution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Groups of animals are seen engaged in behaviors as diverse as social foraging [1,2], predator detection [3,4], and navigation [5,6]. Group sizes of animals often range over several orders of magnitude, even when these different sized groups contain members of the same species living in similar environments [8]. What determines these group sizes and why there is such a variation in their size?. The first mechanistic models emphasized the use of the negative binomial distribution for animal group-size distributions [11,12,13]. Under the negative binomial distribution, the probability of observing a group of size N is given by

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.