Abstract

While the use of patent mapping tools is growing, the ‘black-box’ systems involved do not generally allow the user to interfere further than the preliminary retrieval of documents. Except, that is, for one thing: the stopword list, i.e. the list of ‘noise’ words to be ignored, which can be modified to one’s liking and dramatically impacts the final output and analysis. This paper invokes information science and computer science to provide clues for a better understanding of the stopword lists’ origin and purpose, and how they fit in the mapping algorithm. Further, it stresses the need for stopword lists that depend on the document corpus analyzed. Thus, the analyst is invited to add and remove stopwords—or even, in order to avoid inherent biases, to use algorithms that can automatically create ad hoc stopword lists.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.