Abstract

BackgroundCurrent German or UK package leaflets do not contain an explicit notice that the listing of side effects does not imply that they are caused by the drug. Causal interpretations by patients and lay people are frequently observed. The authors examined whether health professionals understand that there is not necessarily a causal relation between drug intake and the frequency of side effects and whether adding placebo comparison improves understanding.MethodsExploratory survey consisting of eight assessments, each containing 2–6 survey items, and focus groups with one survey sample using questionnaires on adverse reactions in standard package leaflets and modified package leaflets supplemented with placebo comparison. Participants were convenience samples of 379 health professionals including 153 physicians (80 gynaecologists, 124 diabetes experts - physicians, nurses, and others, 39 medical students in their last year at university, 49 first year health science and education students with completed vocational training and professional experience in various health care professions and 87 pharmacists/pharmacy students). They were asked to rate how often the different adverse reactions listed were caused by drug intake.All surveys were carried out within university seminars and postgraduate lectures from April 2014 to June 2015 in Germany. Response rate was 86 % or higher.ResultsWithout placebo comparison, the majority of participants responded that the drug causes adverse reactions with the frequency given in the package leaflet or even more often (95 % of health science students, 100 % of medical students, 60 to 80 % of physicians and 66 % of pharmacists/pharmacy students). Simply adding placebo comparison in a table did not prevent misunderstanding. Analysis of focus groups with health science students supported the lack of understanding.ConclusionsIn the present surveys, health professionals had major difficulties understanding frequency information on side effects in package leaflets. The great majority erroneously implied a causal relation between drug intake and the frequency of side effects, even though most side effects listed are symptoms commonly experienced in daily life.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1160-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Current German or UK package leaflets do not contain an explicit notice that the listing of side effects does not imply that they are caused by the drug

  • We focused on adverse reactions that seem to occur with a comparable frequency without drug intake – depression/mood disorder and weight gain for oral contraceptives and myalgia/muscle pain for statins

  • Standard package leaflet When asked how often the oral contraceptive causes depression or weight gain, 22/22 (100 %) and 20/22 (91 %) health science students stated the frequency of occurrence given in the package leaflet (Table 1/question 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Current German or UK package leaflets do not contain an explicit notice that the listing of side effects does not imply that they are caused by the drug. Studying the package leaflet she was worried by the reported effects of the pill on her psyche. She reasoned: “More than 1 in 10 experience depression due to the pill” and “10 % of women are suffering from tiredness and weakness” [1]. She undoubtedly interpreted the listed frequencies of symptoms as causally related to the oral contraceptive. A systematic review of the literature revealed that so far, no research has been published on causal interpretation of adverse events in package leaflets by patients, laypeople or health professionals

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.