Undermatching in humans to amount of reinforcement

Abstract

Human subjects were exposed to a concurrent-chain procedure in which amount of reinforcement in the terminal links was varied. The experimental procedure was designed to resemble as closely as possible animal operant procedures: verbal instructions were eliminated, the key-press operant response was shaped, and a “consummatory” response was required to receive reward. In addition to varying amount of reward, three different pairs of initial-link values in the concurrent chain were studied. The human subjects showed undermatching to amount of reinforcement (as do animal subjects). Moreover, the degree of undermatching tended to increase as the values of the initial links increased, consistent with Fantino's delay reduction hypothesis (1977) that choice for a larger reward decreases as the length of the initial link increases.