Underlying causes for prevalent false positives and false negatives in STARR-seq data.

Abstract

Self-transcribing activeregulatory region sequencing (STARR-seq)and its variants have been widely used to characterize enhancers. However, it has been reported that up to 87% of STARR-seq peaks are located in repressive chromatin and are not functional in the tested cells. While some of the STARR-seq peaks in repressive chromatin might be active in other cell/tissue types, some others might be false positives. Meanwhile, many active enhancers may not be identified by the current STARR-seq methods. Although methods have been proposed to mitigate systematic errors caused by the use of plasmid vectors, the artifacts due to the intrinsic limitations of current STARR-seq methods are still prevalent and the underlying causes are not fully understood. Based on predicted cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) and non-CRMs in the human genome as well as predicted active CRMs and non-active CRMs in a few human cell lines/tissues with STARR-seq data available, we reveal prevalent false positives and false negatives in STARR-seq peaks generated by major variants of STARR-seq methods and possible underlying causes. Our results will help design strategies to improve STARR-seq methods and interpret the results.