Abstract
Coal is the major energy source and provides about 40 percent of the total electricity production of the world .For Australia it is nearly 80%. Meeting up global demand for less emission of GHS, Australia is seeking alternative ecofriendly renewable energy sources. In Australia, there is huge range of fossil fuel resources (especially deep seated coal deposits, which are difficult to extract with conventional mining) and the policy makers are seeking "clean coal" technology for further usages of the resources. CSG (coal seam gas) and UCG (underground coal gasification) are identified technology for exploiting those coal deposits. The UCG is much more effective process for energy exploitation (theoretically greater than 15-20 times) compared to CSG process. Demonstration of UCG projects and development of these technology received momentum as one of the successful project at Chinchilla, Queensland, Australia is operating successfully from 1997 to 2013 for power generation. Last few years there was a debate for choosing priority policy for CSG or UGC. Australian local entrepreneur and global IOCs sought for massive scale CSG extraction and presently this industry is in booming stage. Apparently it is seen from the industry trend for UCG operation is behind the race compared to CSG activity. But the future prospect of UCG is bright, as we can say for adopting policy "First CSG later on UGC; can't be CSG after UCG operation, as there left nothing exploitable in the coal body". The ideal conditions of the coal body are deviated while CSG operation is being done. Very minor amount of hydro-carbon (in-situ natural gas) are extracted but major share of the coal deposit are left over at deep geological formation. Even there is a provision for simultaneous operation of the both in the same block. Review on the existing and developing sophisticated technology for next phase of abandoned CSG fields is a potential area for further R&D. The success of this effort can enlightened the black coal towards "Cleanest and Greenest" source of energy for next generation Hydrogen fuel.
Highlights
Coals were formed 100-400 Million years ago and their quality depends on the formation process, temperature, pressure as well as materials, where geological condition plays the main role
Coals are exploited by conventional mining where the geological condition, depth of deposit, environment and ecological impacts are viable in respect of return and cost effective operation
This study presents a review on underground coal gasification (UCG) projects in Australia & other areas, identified issues on UCG technology presented
Summary
Coals were formed 100-400 Million years ago and their quality depends on the formation process, temperature, pressure as well as materials, where geological condition plays the main role. In 1939 the former Soviet Union had successfully begun operating a UCG plant at Ukraine, which was later shut down by German occupation Later on they introduced UCG project in1960s, at Angren, Uzbekistan for running a power station (figure - 1) which is still operating and producing about a million standard cubic feet of syngas per hour [3]. Implementing the ability of UGC requires extensive feasibility study and long term effort considering the economic values, less emission of GHG, trapping and storage of the major carbon products of pre/post combustion activity In addition to this the experts are seeking provision for permanent storage of carboneus material in leftover deep firing chambers of the coal seam area.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
