Abstract
In the post Council on Rehabilitation Education (CORE) era, many undergraduate rehabilitation programs find themselves in a predicament with unanswered questions about the future as it relates to ethical and quality programming. In this conceptual manuscript, the authors discuss the direction of undergraduate programs in light of the (July 1, 2017) CORE/CACREP merger. The manuscript provides functional definitions of quality and explores the ethical obligations of undergraduate rehabilitation education programs and faculty. The authors describe how quality and ethics serve as the basis for preparing undergraduate rehabilitation education students for employment. The manuscript also provides implications, strategies, and recommendations for future research that are directed at developing and maintaining quality undergraduate rehabilitation programs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
