Abstract

ABSTRACTEntamoeba histolytica is not a common causative agent of acute appendicitis. However, amoebic appendicitis can sometimes be severe and life threatening, mainly due to a lack of awareness. Also, its frequency, clinical features, and pathogenesis remain unclear. The study subjects were HIV-1-infected individuals who presented with acute appendicitis and later underwent appendectomy at our hospital between 1996 and 2014. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded preserved appendix specimens were reexamined by periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining and PCR to identify undiagnosed amoebic appendicitis. Appendectomies were performed in 57 patients with acute appendicitis. The seroprevalence of E. histolytica was 33% (14/43) from the available stored sera. Based on the medical records, only 3 cases were clinically diagnosed as amoebic appendicitis, including 2 diagnosed at the time of appendectomy and 1 case diagnosed by rereview of the appendix after the development of postoperative complications. Retrospective analyses using PAS staining and PCR identified 3 and 3 more cases, respectively. Thus, E. histolytica infection was confirmed in 9 cases (15.8%) in the present study. Apart from a significantly higher leukocyte count in E. histolytica-positive patients than in negative patients (median, 13,760 versus 10,385 cells/μl, respectively, P = 0.02), there were no other differences in the clinical features of the PCR-positive and -negative groups. In conclusion, E. histolytica infection was confirmed in 9 (15.8%) of the appendicitis cases. However, only 3, including one diagnosed after intestinal perforation, were diagnosed before the present analyses. These results strongly suggest there is frequently a failure to detect trophozoites in routine examination, resulting in an underestimation of the incidence of amoebic appendicitis.

Highlights

  • Entamoeba histolytica is not a common causative agent of acute appendicitis

  • In 2 of these 3 cases, the primary physicians suspected amoebic infection based on the clinical characteristics, such as Japanese HIV-1-infected patients, men who have sex with men (MSM), and past medical history of amoebiasis, these patients showed only typical clinical features of acute appendicitis

  • The patient subsequently underwent ileocecal resection at postoperative day (POD) 130, though treatment with metronidazole was provided for 2 weeks, and Entamoeba was not detected in the resected ileocecal sample

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Entamoeba histolytica is not a common causative agent of acute appendicitis. amoebic appendicitis can sometimes be severe and life threatening, mainly due to a lack of awareness. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded preserved appendix specimens were reexamined by periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining and PCR to identify undiagnosed amoebic appendicitis. Based on the medical records, only 3 cases were clinically diagnosed as amoebic appendicitis, including 2 diagnosed at the time of appendectomy and 1 case diagnosed by rereview of the appendix after the development of postoperative complications. E. histolytica infection was confirmed in 9 cases (15.8%) in the present study. Only 3, including one diagnosed after intestinal perforation, were diagnosed before the present analyses These results strongly suggest there is frequently a failure to detect trophozoites in routine examination, resulting in an underestimation of the incidence of amoebic appendicitis. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) preserved appendix samples of HIV-1-infected appendicitis patients were rigorously examined by PAS staining and PCR to determine the exact prevalence, clinical features and pathogenesis of amoebic appendicitis

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.