Abstract

Workers in occupations that underutilize their experience, training, and skills are underemployed. Underemployment occurs for various reasons including productivity growth, spousal employment and income, family constraints, spatial restrictions, or personal preferences. Underemployment provides opportunities for selective job creation and economic growth. Using local employment dynamics (LED) and a statewide surve of the employed and nonworkers for 2004 and 2005, we examine the interaction between underemployment and LED. We show that poor local labor market conditions accentuate the perception of underemployment and lead to higher level of underemployment. Gender and ethnic differentials are also revealed in the characteristics of the underemployed.

Highlights

  • Workers in occupations that underuse their experience, training, and skills are underemployed

  • This paper examines the relationship between underemployment, characteristics of the labor force, and local labor market conditions using the survey developed by Center for Business and Economic Research (CBER) and Local Employment Dynamics (LED) data resulting from an inter-agency collaboration

  • We examine the relationships between underemployment and both labor force characteristics and local labor market conditions

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Workers in occupations that underuse their experience, training, and skills are underemployed. This paper examines the relationship between underemployment, characteristics of the labor force, and local labor market conditions using the survey developed by CBER (see Section 3 and Addy et al, 2005, 2006 for more details) and Local Employment Dynamics (LED) data resulting from an inter-agency collaboration. The result is a unique set of information that can be of great potential value to community and regional leaders, educators, planners, policy makers, economic developers, and prospective employers These data enable the study of the relationship between underemployment and both characteristics of the labor force and local labor market conditions, the focus of this paper. We discuss our empirical results and conclude with the contributions of our study

THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL UNDERPINNINGS
DESCRIPTION OF THE SURVEY AND EMPIRICAL METHODOLOGY
20. Question
INTERPRETATION OF ESTIMATION RESULTS
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.